Bar 101 with Bruce Rivera

Dear Atty. Bruce Rivera,

Balita ko po may bar question sample po kayo. Resibo.

Sali ako ha sa pagsagot. Eto po ang sagot ko po.

In the concept of a donation, as defined under the Civil Code provisions on transfers of ownership.

No, no crime was committed.

Shakira received money from sponsors in the concept of a donation. Upon Shakira’s acceptance, ownership of the funds passed to Shakira, and she could dispose of it however she saw fit.

The circumstance surrounding the donations was Shakira’s representation that she would use the funds for competing in a beauty pageant. As a portion of the funds was in fact used for the pageant, there was hence no indication of bad faith or fraud on Shakira’s part in asking for and accepting the donations.

There was neither an express condition imposed on the donations, nor an express provision for the return of excess funds after the pageant. Hence, no obligation arose on Shakira’s part to return the excess of the funds donated.

Pero, kung ako ang nagdonate sasama ang loob ko. Kasi parang feeling ko niloko ako ni Shakira. Nagbigay ako ng pera para manalo sya, kasya naman sana yun, pero tinipid niya para lang sa retoke niya? Hindi ba nakakasama ng loob? Wala mang crime na nacommit pero mas malala pa ang puwedeng mangyari. Yun ay mawalan ng tiwala ang mga supporters ni Shakira sa kanya. Atty. Bruce sana walang “Shakira” kang makilala in this lifetime.

Oo nga pala, about this post. Resibo.

Wag kang mag alala, hindi ka po kasali. Sa lahat na mga DDS bloggers, ikaw po ang nakita ko po na may prinsipyo pag pera ang pinag uusapan.

Madami kang napapatawa sa kawierdohan niyo po, lalo na pag kasama niyo  si Jek2x. Resibo.

This is your doll.

Anyway, yung 2 and 3 question niyo po. Try ko din pong sagutan.

Hindi Pekeng Law Student,

PAB

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *